Strategies used by Queensland Department of Education Investigators / Reviewers.
An investigator may change the wording of your complaint to avoid investigating the real problem.
This seems to be a very common Queensland public service strategy.
Your complaint / grievance may have been falsified by being "lost".
The official record of a 120 page grievance can be reduced to three pages with this strategy.
An "internal reviewer" may simply copy from documents that he knows to be falsified.
He may have been instructed not to "consider" your responses to the falsified documents.
An "internal reviewer" may have been instructed not to ask questions and find out any facts.
He may have been instructed to "infer from the documents".
This gives the internal reviewer carte blanche to claim to have "inferred" more or less any nonsense from the documents, even if the evidence in the documents totally contradicts the "inference" drawn by the reviewer.
- The Department of Education practice of making "inferences based on the documents" is wide open to abuse. It should stop.
Official "investigation reports" may be ambiguous and suggest several different meanings to different readers.
And what you are told at a "meeting to discuss the findings of the investigation" may be quite the opposite to the real findings of the investigation.
There may not even have been an investigation.
Comments